This GP factsheet gives a guide for diagnosis, testing and treatment or chronic UTI.
It has been created by The Chronic Urinary Tract Infection Campaign (CUTIC) in collaboration with experts in chronic UTI and they have kindly allowed us to share it here.
In 2008 it was estimated that nearly 45% of the world’s population were affected by lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and this is expected to rise.1 Even in acute, uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTIs), rates of recurrence are high. 20-30% of patients have symptomatic or microbiological recurrence following standard antibiotic treatment 2 and up to 70% experience another UTI within a year.3 Up to 1.7 million women aged 18+ in Britain suffer from chronic LUTS.4
To date, we do not have NICE guidance for chronic UTI.
Chronic UTI affects men, women and children and has a significant impact on quality of life yet it is poorly understood.
Recurrent UTI symptoms are often treated with short courses of antibiotics. When negative urine dipsticks and midstream urine cultures (MSUs) are encountered, many patients are denied antibiotic therapy and are referred on to specialists where further diagnoses of interstitial cystitis (IC), painful bladder syndrome (PBS), urethral syndrome (US) or overactive bladder (OAB) are proposed on the basis of these negative urine tests. This is despite the fact that numerous studies have shown dipsticks and MSUs to be unreliable.5,6,7,8,9
The MSU culture misses up to 90% of patients with a chronic UTI. The urine dipstick misses 60% of chronic urinary tract infections.5,6
It is positive for nitrite in <18% and positive for leucocytes in <40% of acute UTIs with positive MSU culture. 5,6,7,8,9
IC, PBS, US, OAB: a diagnosis that is failing chronic UTI sufferers
These are diagnosed after a UTI has been ruled out using the gold standard urine dipstick and MSU culture testing. There is no widely successful cure or care pathway for these refractory conditions.10 Surgical interventions such as cystoscopy, biopsy, urethral dilatation, cystodistension, bladder laser, botox injections, urodynamics and instillations are invasive, painful and often repeated when seeking a diagnosis. All of these procedures carry an inherent risk and are of no benefit to the patient.
A 2016 analysis of 36 RCTs evaluating 1,822 participants found that bladder instillations are no better than placebo.11 Patients are offered CBT, painkillers, anti-depressants and often told they have to accept and live with it as a part of their ageing process.13
Infection — not inflammation
Burgeoning evidence suggests chronic and recalcitrant LUTS are missed bacterial infections which resulting in chronic inflammation, bladder symptoms and neuropathic pain. Effective early intervention is the key to preventing a chronic UTI. 14,15,16
NICE guidance prioritises test results over symptoms but these tests are inaccurate
Standard urine culture misses 90% of patients with a chronic urinary tract infection.5,6
A study published in 2018 using urine specimens obtained via the clean-catch MSU method and utilising the UK microbiological protocols which are tailored to acute UTI, failed to detect a variety of bacterial species, including recognised uropathogens. The gold standard MSU culture was unable to differentiate between patients with LUTS and the controls.5 Evidence shows that it is not appropriate to rely on these tests for chronic UTI.
Kass criteria: no longer the gold standard
The current microbiological criteria to diagnose UTI is the Kass Criteria.17It was never validated for all UTIs. It originates from 60-year-old research on a small sample of pregnant women with acute pyelonephritis. The threshold for infection (≥105 CFUs/mL of a single species of a known uropathogen) has been disputed and thresholds as low as 102 CFUs/mL is reported in some US and European guidelines.18 Kass also made an erroneous assumption that mixed growth is likely contamination.
It is now known that the urinary microbiome is complex and a normal bladder hosts up to 400 different species of organisms.5,19 Advanced second-generation sequencing techniques and quantitative PCR testing have validated the presence of an array of bacteria as part of a healthy bladder biome with increased numbers in chronically-infected bladders. Despite this enhanced information, much research needs to be done in order to identify the causative agent/agents.20,21,22 Standard culture media are highly sensitive to E. coli but detect as little as 12% of other clinically significant species.22
A disease model for chronic UTI
It is now known that uropathogens utilise microbial communities protected by an extra-cellular matrix. These biofilms undergo morphological changes, increasing resistance to both the immune response and to antibiotics.23,24 Uropathogens in chronic or recurrent UTI colonise the urothelium, creating intracellular reservoirs which reinfect the urine when urothelial cells are shed, days, weeks or months later. The colonised urothelium is weakened by the inflammatory process, leading to an increased rate of apoptosis. Prolonged inflammation of the mucosa also leads to remodelling, resulting in an increased susceptibility to recurrent UTIs.16,25 Sub-lethal levels of ciprofloxacin promoted urothelial colonization and biofilm formation in murine studies.14 Other researchers found it caused genetic changes conferring multi-drug resistance.26
Treatment of chronic UTI
Antibiotics are only effective against actively dividing microbes. Bacteria embedded in the bladder wall are dormant and do not divide. These “persisters” are not targeted by most antibiotics which act at extracellular level. Tissue-penetrating antibiotics do not have the capability to kill dormant microbes hence they evade antibiotic attack.27
An observational study in 2018 reported 10 year data from a specialist centre on 624 patients with CUTI treated successfully with long-term, full-dose, narrow-spectrum, first-generation antibiotics. The lengthy full-dose regime manages to suppress the bacterial activity as they emerge from the shed urothelium, thereby preventing reinfection of young and deeper cells. In this study 84% of patients rated their condition as “much better” and of those, 64% rated their condition as “very much better.” On average it took 383 days of continuous treatment to achieve symptom resolution.28 A further study from the same centre, reported the consequences of cessation of treatment in 221 patients following an unprecedented closure in 2015. 199 patients reported deterioration in their symptoms, 11 patients required hospital admission due to severe urosepsis, one patient developed a renal abscess and there were other serious medical consequences as a result of this. Symptom scores increased after cessation and recovered on re-initiating treatment, providing a proof of concept that the treatment with antibiotics was indeed needed to keep CUTI at bay.29
Treating persistent or recurrent UTI
- Believe in your patient’s history and treat according to symptoms, not just their test results
- Prescribe longer courses of antibiotics until symptoms are cleared. Short courses are only effective for simple, uncomplicated UTI and repeated ineffective courses can promote microbial resistance 26
- Ensure antibiotics are taken promptly and encourage your patient to return early if their symptoms persist
- Do not discount low CFU counts or mixed growths and treat the symptomatic patients promptly. In the presence of significant symptoms the quantification of the bacterial counts on MSU culture are no longer accepted as a valid method of validating or disproving an infection, no matter how low the threshold is set
- Advise your patient on how to provide a concentrated clean-catch urine sample but do not dismiss mixed growth as contamination as UTIs are polymicrobial 7,30 and urothelial cells are a marker of chronic infection 8
- Encourage the patient to drink normally as dilute samples often lead to negative results
- Treat early on the basis of acute symptoms as tests are unreliable and inaccurate and remember that analgesia is not a substitute to antibiotics. Stress does not cause a UTI and not treating or believing a patient will certainly result in stress
- In the presence of recurrent UTI symptoms, GPs should refer patients to a centre with a special interest in recurrent or chronic UTI and not to a general gynaecology, urogynaecology or urology
- Tests to diagnose UTI are highly unreliable and often falsely-negative
- Chronic UTI is on the rise and all clinicians need to be updated
- Symptoms and history are the key to a diagnosis
- Early diagnosis and prompt treatment is the key to preventing chronic UTI
- It is no longer acceptable to deny patients treatment on the basis of faulty diagnostics